How do you know if somebody uses vim?...
How do you know if somebody uses vim?
.
.
..
.
.
Don't worry, they will tell you.
Home of Shariq Mustaquim on the Internet!
How do you know if somebody uses vim?
.
.
..
.
.
Don't worry, they will tell you.
Amazon’s Leadership Principles form the core of the company’s DNA. Some are foundational, others procedural, and all of them reflect essential facets of what it means to be Amazonian. But our Leadership Principles are more than cultural artifacts – they are, in fact, central to how we operate.
I once was a Siebel expert, with its demise came a challenge for me.
I am happy I had to let it go, it opened amazing new possiblities for me.
Today I donated the last of these books.
Picture them in Amazon!!!
Templates for abrupt absence from Office. Copy/Paste
A lot of customers ask:
Can a CodePipeline GitHub source provide more than just one branch?
CodePipeline can currently only run on a single branch per source action which is defined in the action configuration. You need to specify a git repository and branch name when you create a pipeline, so if a branch name is unknown like GitFlow branching model, it is not possible to create a pipeline in advance.
CodePipeline tied to a single git branch is more of a feature of CodePipeline as the design is more inclined towards Trunk based development. Also, as per the designers of this service, CodePipeline is designed for post-merge/release validation. That is, once your change is ready to be released to production and is merged into your master/main branch, CodePipeline takes over and automatically tests and releases the final merged set of changes. CodePipeline has a lot of features like stage locking, superseding versions, etc. which don't work well for the case where you want to test a change in isolation before it's merged (e.g. feature branch testing or pull request testing.) Therefore there currently isn't a recommended way to do this in CodePipeline.