I once was a Siebel expert...

I once was a Siebel expert, with its demise came a challenge for me.

I am happy I had to let it go, it opened amazing new possiblities for me.

Today I donated the last of these books.

What I look for when interviewing

  1. Ability to do job (Functional Fit) 
  2. Fit to company (Leadership Principals)

Picture them in Amazon!!!

Templates for abrupt absence from Office

Templates for abrupt absence from Office. Copy/Paste

  1. Morning Team, I am  not feeling well and will take off to rest.
  2. Morning team, I couldn't get a proper night's sleep and don't feel well enough to work today. 

Can a CodePipeline GitHub source provide more than just one branch

A lot of customers ask:

Can a CodePipeline GitHub source provide more than just one branch?

CodePipeline can currently only run on a single branch per source action which is defined in the action configuration. You need to specify a git repository and branch name when you create a pipeline, so if a branch name is unknown like GitFlow branching model, it is not possible to create a pipeline in advance.

CodePipeline tied to a single git branch is more of a feature of CodePipeline as the design is more inclined towards Trunk based development. Also, as per the designers of this service, CodePipeline is designed for post-merge/release validation. That is, once your change is ready to be released to production and is merged into your master/main branch, CodePipeline takes over and automatically tests and releases the final merged set of changes. CodePipeline has a lot of features like stage locking, superseding versions, etc. which don't work well for the case where you want to test a change in isolation before it's merged (e.g. feature branch testing or pull request testing.) Therefore there currently isn't a recommended way to do this in CodePipeline.